Survey feedback

As a lot of different answers are given, please be aware that any summary cannot possibly cover all responses given. Nevertheless, hereby a very brief summary of the topic that are mentioned the most in the responses. 235 people submitted their feedback.

As a lot of different answers are given, please be aware that any summary cannot possibly cover all responses given. Nevertheless, hereby a very brief summary of the topic that are mentioned the most in the responses. 235 people submitted their feedback.

1. How should the FRBE / KBSB / KSB support its clubs (development, management, creation, etc.) (154 responses)

• Financial support
• Improved visibility of competitions
• Offer training sessions and study materials
• Support in new player development, club & and tournament management

2. How can the FRBE /KBSB / KSB improve its communication? (newsletter, instagram, facebook, tiktok, streaming?) (198 responses)

• Regular newsletter for members
• Improved social media presence
• Regular member communication (e-mail & other channels)

3. How can the FRBE / KBSB / KSB obtain more sponsorship / do you know of any companies that wish to sponsor the FRBE / KBSB / KSB? (88 responses)

• Reach out to technology companies, local business & governments
• Increase advertising and marketing efforts
• Create a sponsorship committee
• Increase visibility through events and social media

4. How do you think the FRBE / KBSB / KSB can promote chess even more? (tournaments / events / training / youth / …) (182 responses)

• Organize more tournaments/events
• Invest in youth programs, promote chess through schools
• Conduct chess training
• Create beginner-friendly events
• Improve media coverage

5. What should be the most important functionalities of the Belgian Chess Federation website for you? (184 responses)

• Better access to tournament information, ratings and regulations
• Provide a central platform for club information, calendar and tournament registration
• Online learning materials and study resources
• ELO rating system and player statistics

6. Do we need a national rating system next to a global worldwide system? (231 responses)

• Clear majority in favor of moving towards a unified global rating system (FIDE). Arguments against are mainly:
  • Additional cost
  • Increased reporting requirements (deadlines, pre-registration)
  • Need for additional referees

7. Leave any additional comments or remarks here (73 responses)

All individual remarks